tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682262344930040012.post3166786761648575400..comments2024-03-29T06:06:39.405+00:00Comments on Talking about F1: The F1 blog: Ayrton Senna – My Opinion on What Caused his Crash?, by Ibrar MalikGraham Keillohhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11514708469215327323noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682262344930040012.post-15870329612837622892023-05-10T07:42:09.437+01:002023-05-10T07:42:09.437+01:00Nice blog thanks foor postingNice blog thanks foor postingProgramming Joehttps://medium.com/@Programmingjoenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3682262344930040012.post-79885348492413265942020-05-19T14:43:22.199+01:002020-05-19T14:43:22.199+01:00Schucmacher and Hill are not the best people to ju...Schucmacher and Hill are not the best people to judge what happened. Don't need to explain why. But comparing Tamburello to Eau Rouge is silly. Eau Rouge-Raidillon is in no way a easy corner and was NOT flat out back then. In fact it wasn't flat out at least well into the early 2000s and possibly later.<br />No, he couldn't have carried too much speed through Tamburello. I don't know why people keep perpetuating such absurd claims and it is easy to observe Schumacher taking Tamburello behind Senna with the same speed.<br />No, the tires were not cold. And if they were, the car would have showed it on one of the tricky technical parts of the track - the chicanes, Tosa, etc.<br />Yes, the cars sparked and bottomed out and it was completely normal. The picture you have up there seems to be Mansell's car and it is sparking too. All cars sparked practically all the time up to 1994. You can see even more sparks at the old Hockenheim races.<br />Finally, Senna had done a lot more laps on Imola with passive suspension cars than with active cars.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com