Sunday, 30 June 2019

Did a Return to Simpler Cars in 1994 Contribute to the Accidents?, by Ibrar Malik

"The cars are immediately less stable without the electronic suspension. As a consequence, they are harder to drive and we'll have more cars spinning and going off the track" 
Ayrton Senna, Williams Driver (Killed during San Marino GP)

“Several commentators said it was the elimination of driver aids (to blame for the accidents), a classic post hoc point. It was an intensely stupid inference but was nevertheless widely reported.” 
Max Mosley, FIA President

Following the tragedies of the 1994 San Marino GP, a mass-media hysteria gathered and called for immediate repercussions but couldn't agree on what they should be. Some suggestions were constructive, some destructive, most were frankly a veiled attempt to turn tragedy into titillation. Generally, the fewer journalists knew about F1, the greater the mock outrage was. FIA President Max Mosley was initially at pains to avoid a knee-jerk response…that was until Karl Wendlinger suffered an almost fatal crash at Monaco less than two weeks later. Mosley then came under intense pressure from outside motorsport to impose urgent safety measures, but teams were in an uproar over the haste of such action. They argued Mosley's measures would not be safer until the knock-on effects were established, this led to more problems which are detailed in the book.

Mosley felt it was a statistical cluster that so many accidents happened at Imola 1994. But choose his words carefully afterwards to avoid being branded as irresponsible by a media baying for blood.

Meanwhile, the debate raged whether the banning of driver aids and active suspension played any part in the accidents. Reigning world champion Alain Prost stated "The cars are more difficult to drive [in 1994]. They are traumatising on the physical side." And it was Senna's early experiences in the 1994 Williams which prompted him to claim "it's going to be a season with lots of accidents…" Martin Brundle, who replaced Senna at McLaren, adds "some of the cars still had aero optimised for all the goodies and suddenly all the goodies weren't there, so you ended up with – in F1 terms – a slightly agricultural fix while you were getting the rest of it together. You certainly had less control of the car."

Senna's prophecy seemly came true as it was supported by the statistics. By the end of May 1994, F1 suffered nine serious accidents resulting two fatalities and five major injuries and two very lucky escapes. Compare that to 1993 and '95 where there were five and three major accidents by June in those respective years. Fortunately, none of the accidents in 1993 and '95 resulted in serious injuries or fatalities. Undoubtedly F1's luck had run out during that dark period in '94 and while the above statistics tell a story, one must remember accidents can happen at any time.

Likewise there was no direct connection between those nine accidents either, however, in the majority of cases drivers were pushing too hard in unfamiliar cars. The 1994 Williams was notoriously unpredictable to drive on the limit at the time. This stemmed from not appreciating how difficult it was converting their car back to passive suspension and remarrying the aerodynamics accordingly. Furthermore, Williams' Paddy Lowe believes "traction control brought qualities to the car the driver didn't really appreciate. Everybody had been running traction control for at least a year, if not two [by '94], so going to a car that suddenly doesn't have it is going to be quite a handful."

Damon Hill applied caution in his driving until he was more familiar with the 1994 spec cars whereas Senna, rightly or wrongly, took greater risks. 

Nevertheless, Mosley's view was: "the small teams did not have them last year and in 1991 virtually nobody had them. It is inconceivable that a driver of Senna's skill would be inconvenienced by a lack of driver aids". Furthermore, in Mosley's autobiography, he highlighted most F1 drivers acquired their skills in cars not equipped with electronic aids. It would be foolish to lay the whole blame for the 1994 accidents solely on the banning of driver aids alone, as there were many other factors involved all of which is detailed extensively in the book. For instance, teams tried extreme car set-ups to try to retain their "knife edge" aerodynamics even though they now had passive suspensions.

Meanwhile, fuel companies no longer had to worry about fuel economy during races, due to the introduction of refuelling, so they started to brew extremely potent fuels which increased the power of the engines. Damon Hill adds: "one thing that changed was the width of the tyres for 1993. The rears were narrowed [from 18 to 15 inches] and I don't think that was terribly good. That carried through to 1994, so maybe with active suspension, the effect of that change was masked a little in 1993. "That meant there was less development on those tyres on passive suspension. When I first tested for Williams at Imola we had the much bigger rear tyre. It was very stable, lots of traction and great to drive. But when we went to the narrower rear tyre the car was a lot less comfortable.”

1994 – The Untold Story of a Tragic and Controversial F1 Season is a new book, which not only covers this topic in more detail but it explains how the driver aid ban was forced through, extremely late and against teams wishes. It is available from Performance Publishing’s website where you can also read a free sample of the book. Alternatively, sign up at: www.1994f1.com/contact  to receive exclusive information on the followup book and have new blogs emailed to you.

Images courtesy; of Alan Dahl and Martin Lee via https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

8 comments:

  1. I am impressed. I don't think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. You are truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog you have got here. Pinta tu coche entero más barato en la provincia de Cádiz

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your site to check out the new stuff you post. 안전놀이터

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this article is very nice and very informative article.I will make sure to be reading your blog more. You made a good point but I can't help but wonder, what about the other side? !!!!!!Thanks 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the blog loaded with so many information. Stopping by your blog helped me to get what I was looking for. 토토사이트

    ReplyDelete
  5. You make so many great points here that I read your article a couple of times. Your views are in accordance with my own for the most part. This is great content for your readers. 안전놀이터

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I?d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I?ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing. Appoint Best Surgeons for sports injuries and recover your injuries fast with drwajid best surgeon for sport injuries.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's superior, however , check out material at the street address. Cash For Cars

    ReplyDelete
  8. Most people consider buying a new car when their old one is in the range of 5 to 10 years old. This is because you can resell your car at a good price at this age. The money can then be used to help buy a new car.John Deere parts

    ReplyDelete